The panel consists of two categories, the first being of suitably, sufficiently qualified and experienced to be nominated and appointed in referrals. Initially these would include retired, South African attorneys that specialised in civil litigation, advocates, magistrates and Small Claims Court commissioners. The second category will consist of suitably qualified and experienced jurists, only requiring some practical experience in the CCT model of arbitration. Members of the last-mentioned group will be provided with the opportunity to gain that necessary experience under a member of the first category after which they will be admitted to the first group.

At this stage we rely on the adjudication experience of our first arbitrators. No Additional qualification in arbitration is required. The second group will be trained by the first and hopefully and in good time we will introduce an arbitration course for our new arbitrators.     

It must immediately be pointed out that aspirant arbitrators may find the prescribed fees of CCT extremely low. This is necessitated by the fundamental aim of this tribunal to render our service affordable and accessible to the general public. Keep however in mind that the whole process is generally conducted in writing and that the arbitrator’s duties can easily be fitted into a normal day schedule or after-hours. With the necessary promotion of the CCT vision this would naturally ensure a very high demand which in turn will a high turnover. This implies that, on a time basis, arbitrators will have a fair opportunity of earning a substantial income. Legal practitioners will also have a chance to develop an arbitration practice.         

With the help of the members of the panel, provision will also be made for peer review. This will be possible by passing finalised cases through the panel to ensure internal oversight for the safeguarding of ethics, integrity and the development of our standard of adjudication. Against the background of the confidentiality within which we render our services to people of whom many are poor and without legal representation, it is absolutely essential that we provide this safeguard. We know that all arbitrations are subject to the oversight of the High Court. However, in many instances financial constraints may prevent this of ever realising in many instances.     

The same would apply to the formation of an ethics committee to be formed out of members of the panel. Through the peer review system and complains from the public, this committee will have the opportunity to oversee and ensure the neutrality and integrity of arbitrators and compliance with the rules.